Many factors today have turned the citizen into a consumer: the burden of debt and the growing role of taxation in the functioning of modern States, the information and growing demands of people where they behave as customers with demands and expectations and the capacity for direct expression have increased tenfold thanks to the new media….
Not that the fundamentals of the Social Contract, as established by Jean-Jacques Rousseau in his famous work published in 1762, are being called into question. Sovereignty remains the popular thing (etymologically, democracy means power to the people), and individuals continue to aspire to a just social organization. This is based on a covenant that guarantees their rights, and they rely on institutions designated, in the case of a democracy, by their vote to exercise their civil liberty.
The aspirations and demands of citizens for new, more horizontal forms of exercising power and for greater participation in public affairs are there. And, within democracies, they increasingly weigh more and more in the electoral sequences. The growing role of social networks amplify the voice of the individual, the information channels, continues to radically modify the exercise of political authority. Whether it is for leaders subject to an obligation to achieve results and a duty to set an example, or for citizens who have become much more active through expression and initiative than mere sideline sports commentators…
A serious amendment must therefore be made to our social contract, to make it a 21st century citizen’s contract in line with this great turning point.
The consequences of this paradigm shift